You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘twitter’ tag.
I woke this morning after dreaming about how to implement a really useful, effective way to use Twitter for the Admissions Office. Thankfully, I didn’t lose all the details upon waking, which sometimes happens to me with dreams interrupted by an alarm.
But I did think, upon waking, that the dream was a really bad sign. A really good sign too, but also a really bad sign.
It told me I don’t have enough waking time to process this sort of thing.
I suspect either tomorrow or the next day I’m going to have to tell my boss that I’ve reached critical mass. That I have too many tasks and need help. It’s swallow my pride time and I hate that.
He’s just back from vacation and the approximately minute-and-a-half I had with him today was not the time to address this, but it does need to happen soon.
The firefighting I’ve been doing has shoved the less pressing things to a back shelf, and if we want to keep them alive, I’ve got to lean on others.
I hate that. I’ve always been a bit of an overachiever, and not always good at delegation: I’ve always subscribed to the “to get things done right, do it yourself” school of thought. But I’m learning. Sometimes the hard way.
In the process, though, I’m learning that people like to be challenged. When I hand over non-drudge work, work that requires critical thought and judgment, they appreciate it. Most of them realize that means I trust them.
And that trust is, sometimes, hard to come by. Hate to admit it, but it’s true. But I’ve got to learn better. Hopefully other folks will help me out by doing well with the projects I hand over.
This post started after reading this blurb questioning the need for committees. And I have to say I agree.
My office excels at bringing together committees, or working groups, or what-have-you. In practice, though, the most effective use of everyone’s time that I’ve seen has been in bringing together the two or three people who will actually do the work for the project and having them keep up with each other.
In a lot of cases, this could be done online. Twitter could be used for up-to-the-minute updates. Or, of course, you could use a more normal project management package. A few of us used Backpack pretty extensively for awhile. The subject experts should only be pulled in as consultants to make a good project run.
But the point of committees in our office (often), unfortunately, and I see the need for it, is generally for buy-in. To keep people aware of how the project is coming.
And I really feel it’s a waste sometimes. But there’s a huge culture change that would need to take place to make it all work without them.
Has anyone else actually been in a place that has managed that change? Any tips you can share?
Amit Gupta wrote about social serendipity today, and it feels like we’ve got a landslide of that going on here at Penn State, though much closer to home than his examples (he’s the guy behind Photojojo, for those not familiar).
As my follow list on Twitter grows, I’m finding more and more amazing, knowledgeable people out there who “get it,” in the words of one of those folks, who it just so happens I got to meet for lunch today.
And the give-and-take of that community, online and off, has been amazing. You end up tapping into the collective knowledge of a ton of experts, as long as you’re willing to wait for an answer.
This has happened to me before, in other forums and communities, but this is as close to home as it’s come. And while it’s really cool to have connections wherever you might need them–an online shout-out for info about Buffalo a couple months ago turned up online friends that I didn’t know were out there, for example–having them right in your backyard is amazing.
I mean, hey. Impromptu lunches are a possibility, even.
But it does cost attention. Design for Emotion and Flow describes this really well in the second paragraph of the article. The rest is no less important, but it’s unrelated to my point here.
There’s a point of balance that I think most of us are still trying to find in this newfound community:
- how to give and take equally to one’s network;
- how to enjoy oneself and others evenly;
- how to find a sympathetic ear to vent without alienating others;
- where “no invitation [is] required” and crashing the party;
- expansion of connections and input overload;
- “value” of contribution and “just being yourself.”
Some of this, no one has talked about at much length. But I’m feeling it out there. And it’s something we all have to work through. Personally, I worked out some of this by dividing my Twitter presence into personal and professional. Folks I meet at conferences may get one or the other depending on the context.
I’m looking forward to solving these problems for myself and seeing what they mean on the grander scale, especially as re-localization becomes a trend.